So, no idea...
Basically things do not work. I've added a correction to the node volume in the axis which gives okays results but still this is not perfect. I need to find a better way to do things. Also, I've noticed that the density changes with the size of the cells, which should not happen! I'vw to check this issue.
This commit is contained in:
parent
11831a973d
commit
667a2ecd93
3 changed files with 39 additions and 25 deletions
|
|
@ -597,18 +597,18 @@ MODULE moduleMesh2DCyl
|
|||
!Computes total volume of the cell
|
||||
self%volume = r*detJ*PI8 !2*pi * 4 (weight of 1 point 2D-Gaussian integral)
|
||||
!Computes volume per node
|
||||
! self%n1%v = self%n1%v + fPsi(1)*self%volume
|
||||
! self%n2%v = self%n2%v + fPsi(2)*self%volume
|
||||
! self%n3%v = self%n3%v + fPsi(3)*self%volume
|
||||
! self%n4%v = self%n4%v + fPsi(4)*self%volume
|
||||
dZ = MAXVAL(self%z) - MIN(self%z)
|
||||
r2 = MAXVAL(self%r)
|
||||
r1 = MINVAL(self%r)
|
||||
|
||||
self%n1%v = self%n1%v + dZ/2.D0 * PI * ( r2**2 - 3.0D0*r1**2 + 2.0D0*r2*r1)*0.25D0
|
||||
self%n2%v = self%n2%v + dZ/2.D0 * PI * ( r2**2 - 3.0D0*r1**2 + 2.0D0*r2*r1)*0.25D0
|
||||
self%n3%v = self%n3%v + dZ/2.D0 * PI * (3.0D0*r2**2 - r1**2 - 2.0D0*r2*r1)*0.25D0
|
||||
self%n4%v = self%n4%v + dZ/2.D0 * PI * (3.0D0*r2**2 - r1**2 - 2.0D0*r2*r1)*0.25D0
|
||||
Xi = (/-5.D-1, -5.D-1, 0.D0/)
|
||||
r = self%gatherF(Xi, 4, self%r)
|
||||
self%n1%v = self%n1%v + fPsi(1)*r*detJ*PI8
|
||||
Xi = (/ 5.D-1, -5.D-1, 0.D0/)
|
||||
r = self%gatherF(Xi, 4, self%r)
|
||||
self%n2%v = self%n2%v + fPsi(2)*r*detJ*PI8
|
||||
Xi = (/ 5.D-1, 5.D-1, 0.D0/)
|
||||
r = self%gatherF(Xi, 4, self%r)
|
||||
self%n3%v = self%n3%v + fPsi(3)*r*detJ*PI8
|
||||
Xi = (/-5.D-1, 5.D-1, 0.D0/)
|
||||
r = self%gatherF(Xi, 4, self%r)
|
||||
self%n4%v = self%n4%v + fPsi(4)*r*detJ*PI8
|
||||
|
||||
END SUBROUTINE volumeQuad
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue