Commit graph

11 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
e05c0d4635 Coulomb Scattering fully conservative
Coulomb scattering is now fully conservative thanks to the method in
lemos2009small.

The trick was to conserve the momentum and energy of ALL particles
involved in the scattering in each cell.

The substeps in Coulomb collisions have been removed as they are no
longer necessary.

Still some issues with e-i, but I don't know right now.
2023-07-16 14:30:49 +02:00
c3a6f77ffc Combining ij - ji collisions
In an attempt to make the operator fully conservarive I have combined ij
and ji collisions (when i/=j).

Now the matter is to find a way that makes this conserve momentum and
energy for intraspecies.
2023-07-12 15:17:26 +02:00
28b2bf206a Added the possibility to have sub-steps
Now per each Coulomb collision process there is the possibility to do
sub-steps. This helps in improving accuracy without reducing the time
step of the problem.
2023-07-12 14:21:29 +02:00
a891360b7a Still unsure, but things fixed
There was an issue with the calculation of theta and phi for the
rotation from W to C. This was causing some velocities not being
correct.

Now the angles are properly computed. Still unsure about the e-i
collisions as they seem to be quite small. Probably a numerical issue
with the mass ratios still exists.
2023-07-12 11:38:12 +02:00
f63e34e266 Not fully conservative but works
The code is still not fully conservative in intra-species collisions
(small error) but at least now is working.

I have to test species with different weight.

I have to implement a fully conservation for intra-species.
2023-07-11 18:55:20 +02:00
c45ffa5380 Dear various gods, finally...
I had to go back to sherlock2008montecarlo to properly understand the
change in frame of reference and how to translate that into the code.
The language there is clear and understandable for a dumb person like
me.

Now I have a Coulomb linear operator that at least works.

However, still not fully 100% conservative, need to fix this with a
correction for intra-species collisions.

I skip gym today because I was unable to focus on other things than
this.
2023-07-11 09:58:50 +02:00
a26dc04051 I hate Coulomb and his Scattering
I found no way to ensure conservation in the linear Coulomb operator.
Thus, now two collisions have to be declared if sp_i /= sp_j: collision
ij and collision ji.

This does not conserve energy so please use under your own risk, like
everything else.

Still, I think something is wrong with this implementation and I'm
really tired.
2023-07-07 16:36:31 +02:00
fe94615a27 First conservative implementation of Coulomb
I am doing a trick in which I ensure that energy is conserved for
Coulomb collisions. This was not happening and what an issue for
different mass ratios. Still, this can cause an issue on getting the
right relaxation rates, still necessary to check it.
2023-03-08 16:37:45 +01:00
f8af7a8dae No progress in fixing Coulomb collisions with mass ratio
I am starting to think that the only fix is to reduce the time step, but
that is too harsh.
2023-03-07 10:10:54 +01:00
6113ac3305 Correction with conservation
Now the method is much better in conserving total energy.
However, still there is an issue with collisions between species of
dispaprate mass.
2023-03-06 16:16:17 +01:00
601103105f First attempt at Coulomb collisions
First attemp for Coulomb collisions based on the moments distribtuions.
Still the method is not done and far from being complete but input
options and basic math are implemented.
2023-02-24 21:46:01 +01:00