Commit graph

117 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
b36f9c2615 Shifting towards constant number of particles per edge
So now each edge has the same number of particles and the weight of each
particle is calculated based on the surface of each edge compared to the
total one.

Only in 2DCyl, still to extend to other geometries.

Not perfect constant density, but the issue might be the node volume.
2024-07-09 17:49:42 +02:00
5bc064d018 Some parallel issues
Forgot to check Gmsh2 format with new changes.

Cartesian coordinates were not calculating things properly.
2024-07-07 11:53:56 +02:00
626e970d82 Some progress
Fixed an issue with random integer numbers.
Cylindrical coordinates are not perfect yet:
  - Box (cylinder) with initial constant density loses particles at r =
    0
  - Injection density still low in r = 0
2024-07-06 19:14:44 +02:00
6b5ac16e4b Still working on it
No uniform density yet...
2024-07-06 10:12:03 +02:00
b972120ed5 Switching to variable particle weight
I have to change the injection of particles. Each edge will receive a
similar number of particles and their weight will change to have a
constant density based on the geometry.

Still testing.
2024-07-04 10:56:13 +02:00
6b78ae3738 Added an adhoc factor to correct injection
I think that the volume of the nodes is not being well calculated, maybe
we need a better volume calculation for this, using multiple points (as
it is done for K)
2024-07-03 22:04:28 +02:00
e277fe6ddb PI is no needed here 2024-06-30 08:48:51 +00:00
59a322a4c7 Clean up
Fixing calculation of node volumes.
2024-06-30 10:46:05 +02:00
cd7bf66bd8 A workaround
The random position for edges in the axis is corrected so that there is
a more uniform charge density in the axis.

Still, things are not perfect and this is something to really look into
in the future.
2024-06-30 10:36:36 +02:00
4cadfe5367 Seems are a bit better
There is still less density in the axis. I don't find a reason why.
There must be a modification to the weight...
2024-06-29 22:22:10 +02:00
5386114d15 Cylindrical injection working better
Seems things are a bit better. Still, more cases are needed and still
not perfectly uniform...
2024-06-29 14:58:48 +02:00
c6470819e8 Issue with calculating coordinates in quads
The third coordinate (unused) was causing some errors when it was
becomming too large.
2024-06-26 15:11:01 +02:00
d86b3a3417 Implementing injection with current density
WARNING: This current denstiy will be multiplied by the reference
length, no the surface area that is being used for injection!

New units in the injection of particles 'Am2' to inject a density
current. Manual has been modified accordingly.

Reference parameters are now also printed in the case folder.
2024-03-28 09:45:46 +01:00
4585390b50 Fixing issue
Fixing an issue with reading tables led me to other issues with
collisions that I think are fixed right now. I am testing with the 1D
ionization model for ALPHIE and things seems to be working properly.
2023-11-21 09:53:36 +01:00
e05c0d4635 Coulomb Scattering fully conservative
Coulomb scattering is now fully conservative thanks to the method in
lemos2009small.

The trick was to conserve the momentum and energy of ALL particles
involved in the scattering in each cell.

The substeps in Coulomb collisions have been removed as they are no
longer necessary.

Still some issues with e-i, but I don't know right now.
2023-07-16 14:30:49 +02:00
c3a6f77ffc Combining ij - ji collisions
In an attempt to make the operator fully conservarive I have combined ij
and ji collisions (when i/=j).

Now the matter is to find a way that makes this conserve momentum and
energy for intraspecies.
2023-07-12 15:17:26 +02:00
28b2bf206a Added the possibility to have sub-steps
Now per each Coulomb collision process there is the possibility to do
sub-steps. This helps in improving accuracy without reducing the time
step of the problem.
2023-07-12 14:21:29 +02:00
a891360b7a Still unsure, but things fixed
There was an issue with the calculation of theta and phi for the
rotation from W to C. This was causing some velocities not being
correct.

Now the angles are properly computed. Still unsure about the e-i
collisions as they seem to be quite small. Probably a numerical issue
with the mass ratios still exists.
2023-07-12 11:38:12 +02:00
f63e34e266 Not fully conservative but works
The code is still not fully conservative in intra-species collisions
(small error) but at least now is working.

I have to test species with different weight.

I have to implement a fully conservation for intra-species.
2023-07-11 18:55:20 +02:00
63fc2842be Small changes
Just some small changes to the code to improve its quality.

Nothing regarding conservation was done yet.
2023-07-11 11:22:19 +02:00
c45ffa5380 Dear various gods, finally...
I had to go back to sherlock2008montecarlo to properly understand the
change in frame of reference and how to translate that into the code.
The language there is clear and understandable for a dumb person like
me.

Now I have a Coulomb linear operator that at least works.

However, still not fully 100% conservative, need to fix this with a
correction for intra-species collisions.

I skip gym today because I was unable to focus on other things than
this.
2023-07-11 09:58:50 +02:00
d75af4bda7 Trying to implement Lemos Coulomb Scatering
I was having tones of issues with the previous implementation. I think
the problem was the velocity vector and how it was returning to the
normal reference frame.

I hope this new implementation works better.
2023-07-11 07:51:49 +02:00
a26dc04051 I hate Coulomb and his Scattering
I found no way to ensure conservation in the linear Coulomb operator.
Thus, now two collisions have to be declared if sp_i /= sp_j: collision
ij and collision ji.

This does not conserve energy so please use under your own risk, like
everything else.

Still, I think something is wrong with this implementation and I'm
really tired.
2023-07-07 16:36:31 +02:00
8d35123508 First Coulomb implementation that works
After fixing all possible divisions by zero I was able to find in the
Coulomb collision I think that this is a first working implementation of
a Coulomb operator based on moments.

Still to test a few things, modify the manual but I would say that I'm
satisfiyed right now. This operator won't be used that often but maybe
improving efficiency is still needed.

In the future a binary operator is required to be able to study cases
out of Maxwellian equilibrium.
2023-07-04 17:01:02 +02:00
ed6c2c46e4 I'm a fucking idiot
The limit I set to avoid divisions by zero was wront and collisions were
being skipped. It is corrected now.
2023-03-29 10:08:11 +02:00
f4448d9e7a Fixed segmentation fault in Coulomb collisions
When the relative velocity between a charged particle and the background
for Coulomb collisions (W in the code) was low, there was a
segmentation fault. This is fixed now as if the norm of the relative
velocity (normW) in the code is too low, no collision is applied.
2023-03-12 17:02:12 +01:00
a70788b95d Fix an issue with compilation
Copy paste error. Now the code compiles.
2023-03-08 19:42:15 +01:00
fe94615a27 First conservative implementation of Coulomb
I am doing a trick in which I ensure that energy is conserved for
Coulomb collisions. This was not happening and what an issue for
different mass ratios. Still, this can cause an issue on getting the
right relaxation rates, still necessary to check it.
2023-03-08 16:37:45 +01:00
f8af7a8dae No progress in fixing Coulomb collisions with mass ratio
I am starting to think that the only fix is to reduce the time step, but
that is too harsh.
2023-03-07 10:10:54 +01:00
6113ac3305 Correction with conservation
Now the method is much better in conserving total energy.
However, still there is an issue with collisions between species of
dispaprate mass.
2023-03-06 16:16:17 +01:00
601103105f First attempt at Coulomb collisions
First attemp for Coulomb collisions based on the moments distribtuions.
Still the method is not done and far from being complete but input
options and basic math are implemented.
2023-02-24 21:46:01 +01:00
386ddd82dd Probes in 0 iteration
Probes are now written at the 0 iteration.

Additionally, and this shouldn't be done, some small changes to the quad
elements. This should be done in a separate commit, but I'm lazy.
2023-02-23 13:36:31 +01:00
8237aa90e9 Incorrect file name in Gmsh2 output
The file with the EMField was being writteng with the wrong name.
Quantities inside were correct.
2023-02-17 12:48:23 +01:00
4e9a592982 Returning to previous version of moduleMesh.f90
Having initialization in some variables was causing issues in 1D
geometry, so I reverted the file to one working.
2023-02-10 18:53:19 +01:00
de1d4567f3 Issue for particles in quad cell
Due to a high convergence value (1.0e-2) in phy2logQuad (variable conv),
    particles were being stuck in some elements, reaching a segmentation
    fault. The new limit (1.0e-4) should avoid this.
2023-02-09 15:32:04 +01:00
f86641110c Issue in connectivity between Quad elements
For unstructured meshes, the quad elements where not being propertly
connected as not all possibilities were tested. This should be fixed
now.
2023-02-09 12:15:18 +01:00
2c55913501 First version of vtu file format
After some testing and making things a bit better and more general, I am
quite happy with the implementation of vtu and it seems that it is
working (at least as good as Gmsh2).

There are some procedures that might be useful for other XML-like
formats that might be moved in the future to the common module (I am
    thinking right now in the implementation of a general format like
    XDMF3).
2023-02-07 16:02:36 +01:00
e9ac9bdd80 Finishing implementation of vtu mesh format
I have tested all geometries and cases and all seem to work perfectly
with .vtu meshes.

Input and output works great, starting from a previous case also works.
Everything I was able to test is okay.

Still, what I want to do is to change a few things in the output (e.g.,
    change OUTPUT prefix to Step) and try to improve reading gmsh meshes
to make them more compact as vtu is now.
2023-02-07 15:19:13 +01:00
ba2b5bc6f3 Fixed issue with initial velocity
The problem was that the number of values for velocity was numNodes and
not 3*numNodes.
2023-02-07 09:43:28 +01:00
515e5c7744 Fix an issue and starting to read information from .vtu initial files
For some reason the connectivity for collision meshes was not being
properly assigned.

Also, the first subroutine to read information from .vtu files as
initial states has been added.
It is currently giving wrong results.
2023-02-06 19:54:54 +01:00
a22099ee87 Improvement to vtu read subroutine
Some improvements to reduce code repetition when reading vtu mesh.
2023-02-06 19:18:04 +01:00
e3eeb97f48 First working version!
First complete implementation of .vtu format.
Still a lot of things to improve but right now fpakc can read a vtu mesh
and write the output in vtu.

Still to test:
  Multiple geometries.
  Double mesh.
2023-02-05 21:33:03 +01:00
43a7421795 Creating of nodes and edges in .vtu format
Moving forward making vtu an independent format.

Now fpakc can generate nodes and edges from vtu input.
Next step is cells.

Some minor corrections in gmsh2 format to unify statements.
The reading of meshes needs a good overhaul.

Testing all geometries with vtu is gonna be fun...
2023-02-05 19:35:49 +01:00
7b470b7f58 Subroutines to read .vtu information
All subroutines to read .vtu information is ready.

Now it is time to create the input and generate a mesh for fpakc.
2023-02-05 18:32:38 +01:00
63fd8fdb91 New functions to read VTU
Added a few functions to read .vtu meshes.

Output in .vtu changed to output data in 6 columns (seems to be the
    standard.)
2023-02-05 16:23:37 +01:00
f5be04587a First step towards reading .vtu mesh
Just setting up the required functions.
2023-02-04 15:41:13 +01:00
6706c5dd1c Average is written in .vtu
The average of the species properties can be written now in .vtu format.
No .pvd file is provided as no time series is generated.

Still to do:
  Read a .vtu mesh.
  Improve gmsh format to use more common functions.
2023-02-04 15:20:36 +01:00
f1c0c5755f Collisions and EM field in .vtu
The collisions and EM field information is now available in .vtu files.
A collection file .pvd is provided per dataset for time-dependent
plotting.

Still to do:
  Write average quantities in .vtu
  Read mesh from .vtu
2023-02-04 12:31:33 +01:00
ceab516a5b Correction on collection file
The extension of the collection file has to be .pvd so that ParaView
properly reads it.
2023-02-04 08:54:36 +01:00
aca84d6312 First output in VTU format
Testing new VTU format.

For now, species information is ALWAYS output in .vtu (to test, this will
    be an independent format in the future).
A .pvd file is produced to do time-series.

Still to implement other outputs (electromagnetic, average,
    collisions...)

Still to implement reading a mesh from .vtu file
2023-02-03 20:14:53 +01:00